The fast and the furious
To all of the above, I say bollocks. And I’m not alone according to a major US survey which recently lifted the sheets on the best sex. Apparently sex is not SUPPOSED to be an epic performance, but rather a fun cameo role lasting between seven and 13 minutes. Even three minute sex is considered ‘adequate’.
I’m hoping that will be music to the ears of my readers who have children and cackle hysterically whenever the topic of sex rears its naked head (you know who you are). Granted, it may take some practice ripping your clothes off, doing the deed, enjoying post-coital bliss and putting your clothes back on in 180 seconds flat, but if you’re short on time the fast and furious quickie has got to be worth a try. I’m an advocate – not all the time, mind you, but I’m not going to decline if it’s the only option on the table.
So, your homework this week, people: set the stopwatch, grab your partner/ bedpal/ favourite vibrator etc, and give that three-minute lovin’ theory a hammering. Honestly, it’s the time it takes to make a cup of tea, thumb through a copy of a trashy mag’s Worst Bikini Bodies issue or shave your legs ankle-to-hip. But none of those pursuits are going to leave you with quite the same twinkle in the eye. At least, I hope not.




7 Comments:
At March 11, 2008 9:44 PM,
Anonymous said…
Frankly, RC, I love a quickie...and often find myself looking at my watch when it's anything longer than ten minutes...though perhaps 3 minutes is a little long for a girl to really rev up...does foreplay count, or is a seperate menu item?
At March 11, 2008 11:13 PM,
reality chick said…
Good point. We're talking side-dish, methinks. The three-minute rule is for those who only require a main course.
At March 13, 2008 12:31 PM,
pollypringle said…
I tried the three-minute rule. It works, but only if you're naked first. If you have to take clothes off as well, you should factor in at least an extra 40, mayb 50 seconds.
At March 13, 2008 2:25 PM,
Anonymous said…
"...but I’m not going to decline if it’s the only option on the table."
-Reality Chick
"...or if the only option is to do it ON the table for that matter."
-Captain Canada ;)
At March 13, 2008 2:29 PM,
reality chick said…
Geez, I think we have a new sub-editor in da house! :)
At March 13, 2008 3:02 PM,
pollypringle said…
Nothing wrong with doing it on a table. In fact, that might assist with the three-minute rule. You can multi-task - shag in between setting the table for dinner!!! :)
At March 13, 2008 3:35 PM,
reality chick said…
Good point Pol. The multi-task shag... now that's one way to use your time effectively.
Post a Comment
Been in this situation yourself? Or simply want to weigh in with a little extra advice? Join in! Thanks for sharing, guys...
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home